“It is a man’s own mind, not his enemy or foe, that lures him to act in evil ways.” There is nothing heroic in Mr. Stack’s act. There is nothing moral in the acts of the four men who attacked two gay men downtown. None of these people were acting with justification against an enemy or a foe. They were acting in conspiracy with hatred that they allowed to consume their minds. This unchecked habit for hatred will divide and conquer us unless we demand of ourselves, our neighbors and our community the capacity to entertain divergent views, the character to live among diversity, and the habit of resolving conflicts peacefully.

In urbanized counties like Travis, our State Legislature’s allegiance to the most extreme notions of property rights and its refusal to provide counties with the tools to balance competing property interests creates social problems we will be living with for generations. TXI may be one of those problems.

The only permit that the State requires TXI to obtain from the County is a development permit tied to our floodplain ordinance. TXI’s proposed use meets all the requirements allowed us by the State. Therefore, denying its application would be difficult to defend.

Here is how our influence may be brought to bear. Back in 2005-2006 about a third of what is now the proposed mining site was identified by the Travis County Greenprint as a high priority purchase for parkland. This unique parcel rests at the confluence of Gilleland Creek and the Colorado River. Separate and apart from the TXI permit process, we are seeking to purchase that parcel.

Next, as is our practice, the County has fully utilized its authority to extract and enforce agreements from TXI to make road improvements addressing its impacts on the local transportation system. The floodplain permit is conditioned on satisfactory performance under the roadway agreement.

And finally, the County is pursuing a new strategy of monitoring the effects of TXI’s mining operation on the water quality, water levels, air quality and noise levels experienced by the neighbors with an eye toward legal action should the monitoring effort reveal serious issues.

TXI has stated its intention to responsibly mine, reclaim and support the eventual redevelopment of the land as residential properties, parks and greenbelts. However, TXI confirmed the following in response to questions in Commissioners Court on December 15, 2009:

1) TXI’s Water Plan to reduce dust is optional;
2) Monitoring the mine’s effects on air quality is not required;
3) Monitoring the mine’s effects on groundwater quality or availability is not required;
4) Monitoring the mine’s noise levels is not required except with regard to the safety of its workers;
5) Buffering the neighbors more than the 50 feet required by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality is optional;
6) Phasing of the mining operation for the benefit of the neighbors is optional;
7) Operating hours are at TXI’s discretion;
8) The duration of the mining activity is dictated by the market; and
9) The State’s standard for reclamation is lax.

Given the latitude afforded TXI in our “property rights” state, I do not believe the mining operation will rise to a higher standard unless our community demands it. In this case, I believe we are in the strongest position to demand that higher standard by working within the admittedly limited authority provided to us under state law and by developing the evidence to fully exercise our prosecutorial authority should it become necessary. Where that authority is lacking, we will prove the inadequacy to the Legislature with hard facts developed through monitoring and continued political engagement on land use policy in our community and in our state.

To be clear, if the decision were mine to make I would support providing the full range of reproductive services, including abortion, to the individuals and families reliant on TCHD-funded providers.  I strongly believe that reproductive health decisions reside with the individual rather than the government.  I further believe that abortion services should remain among the baseline of healthcare services accessible to all irrespective of socioeconomic status.

I welcome the support of like minded folks on this issue.  I also welcome the opposition of those who disagree.  The division in views and the multiplicity in rationales for those views perfectly illustrates how personal and private this choice is and should remain.

- SE

In assessing the dangerousness of Ms. Winkfein’s actions I considered the following facts: Ms. Winkfein is under five feet tall; she is over 72 years of age; and her underlying offense was speeding. In assessing the dangerousness of the deputy constable’s actions I considered the following facts: the manufacturer of the Taser warns law enforcement that use on elderly citizens may pose a significantly higher risk to their health and warns against the repeated use of the Taser; in addition to the initial Tase, the deputy constable deployed a second Tase on Ms. Winkfein as she was laying on the ground face-down, apparently unable to move her arms; and other law enforcement entities (including our own sheriff’s department) do not agree with the deputy constable’s actions. Under these facts, I believe the recent settlement is just. 

Although the Winkfein matter is now settled, a larger issue remains unsettled.  The Winkfein episode elicited a troubling response from some quarters claiming that law enforcement is justified in resorting to force when met with resistance of the lowest threat.  What has become of society when a uniformed, armed, and trained law-enforcement officer bypasses negotiation and skips straight to force in dealing with a citizen of any description, much less a petite woman over 70 years of age?  Support for this deputy constable’s actions illustrates a troubling weakening of our civil liberties. 

If you have comments or questions regarding Constable McCain’s response to the Winkfein matter, he may be reached via e-mail at Richard.McCain@co.travis.tx.us and by phone at (512) 854-2101.

Although I advocate for the preservation of agricultural industry, especially the organic variety, I will not commit public funds for the benefit of private interests without a reasonable belief that the public expenditure will solve the public issue at hand.

The issue is diminishing water supply in the face of increased water demand.

Much of the debate surrounding Tecolote’s plight has focused on blame and restitution - Travis County is to blame for Tecolote’s dry well and therefore Travis County must pay for Tecolote’s new well.  While satisfying from a dramatic standpoint, this framing of the issue is factually and legally insufficient and ultimately beside the point.  It is not just Tecolote that is running out of water.  We are all running out of water.

In eastern Travis County alone, we can expect 1000 more homes reliant on groundwater to be built in the near future.  Just within the 3000 foot radius of Tecolote’s well there are at least nine other wells.  The vast majority of the pumping capacity within that 3000 foot radius is dedicated to residential water supply (Travis County’s two wells represent less than 11% of that pumping capacity and is dedicated to irrigation of a public park).  Other wells within that radius have also drastically declined in productivity.  Drilling a well for every one that goes dry will do nothing to address our desperate need for a sustainable water strategy for the region.

I plead with my community to focus its tremendous energies on regional solutions to our water issues. 

• Support legislation creating a water conservation district to regulate pumping from the Colorado Alluvial Aquifer in Eastern Travis County. 
• Support legislation providing county land-use management in explosive growth corridors reliant on diminishing water supplies.

The Clean Air Coalition has declared 2009 the year of “The Big Push” during the upcoming ozone season running from April 1st to October 31st, to reduce ozone formation by better control of air emission sources. Through concerted effort, Central Texas partners can prevent air quality conditions that would require the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to decide in 2010 that the air quality is insufficiently protective of human health (non-attainment status). The air pollution sources that are most important to address with the Big Push include voluntary reduction of vehicle emissions, changes in operations by businesses/government, and changes in personal and household behavior.

The consequences of dirty air affect our health and our economy. Health concerns due to high ozone include:

•    Shortness of breath
•    Coughing
•    Headaches
•    Nausea
•    Throat and lung irritation
•    Increased asthma attacks

High ozone is linked with increases in hospital admissions and school absences. Sensitive groups to ozone include children, the elderly, people with lung disease, and adults who are active in outdoor pursuits. In addition, high ozone levels affect vegetation by resulting in reduced crop yields, reduced survival of tree seedlings, and increased susceptibility of plants to disease and pests. Economic costs associated with high levels of ozone include increased health care, decreased property values, and diminished quality of life. Reducing air pollution is costly too in terms of planning, implementation and enforcement of air pollution control strategies.

As a member of the Clean Air Coalition, Travis County is implementing internal procedures to address high levels of ozone including:

•    Restrict county operations on Ozone Watch Days;
•    Institute a special Ozone Watch Day teleworking schedule;
•    Educate county employees on commuting options; and
•    Expand communications to Travis County citizens and county employees.

Travis County is encouraging other Clean Air Coalition members as well as major employers to join the effort.

What you can do:

IN THE CAR
•    Limit driving and delay errands. For short trips consider riding a bicycle or walking. Other options include carpooling, vanpooling, working at home, and teleconferencing.
•    Ride the bus. Plan your trip online.
•    Don’t let engines idle unnecessarily. When you can, avoid drive-thru services.
•    Minimize “cold starts” by combining trips. Emission levels are highest when vehicles are first started.
•    Postpone refueling your car until after 6:00 p.m. on hot, sunny days. This reduces the time that escaping fumes have to “cook” during the heat of the day and form ozone.
•    Maintain your vehicle for fuel efficiency. Maintain recommended tire pressure, replace air filters, keep the engine tuned up, and change the oil regularly for peak gas mileage.
•    Don’t overfill or “top off” the gas tank. The refueling process releases ozone-producing fumes. Check to see that the gas cap fits tightly.
•    Be sure that gasoline engines (including boats and mowers) are properly tuned and maintained. Ask that the catalytic converter on your vehicle be inspected for proper function.
•    Avoid traffic congestion. Whenever possible, drive during off-peak hours.
•    Avoid driving for your lunch break. Take a lunch to work or walk to lunch.

IN THE HOME
•    Apply paint with rollers and brushes (instead of sprays) to cut down on fumes.
•    Use latex paints rather than oil-based paints to cut back on ozone-forming fumes.
•    Compost yard waste (instead of burning it) to reduce air pollution.
•    Use an electric or push mower instead of a gasoline-powered mower. A typical gasoline-powered lawn mower generates as much air pollution per hour as 11 cars.
•    Ensure that when you dispose of a gasoline-powered mower that it is destroyed and unusable. Otherwise, it could be resold and it remains a pollutant source.
•    Use rakes, hand edgers, or brooms or other non-gasoline-powered equipment for other yard chores.
•    Conserve energy. Burning fossil fuels in the production of electricity is a source of pollution contributing to ozone formation.
•    Insulate and weather-strip your home.
•    Adjust thermostats to reduce electric consumption.
•    Run dishwashers and washing machines only with a full load.
•    Conserving water also conserves energy—it takes electricity to treat and deliver drinking water.

The following chart illustrates how our region is better off than our state and our country in most metrics of economic health.

This is not to say there aren’t folks in our community that were hurting before the downturn and even more folks who are hurting now.

For long-term economic health we as a people must invest in education and healthcare. While our school districts and our healthcare district and its partners do what they can with inadequate public funding, these issues largely require action at the state and federal level.

In the short term, local government has a role to play in lessening the impact and duration of the downturn. In addition to supporting our school districts and our healthcare networks, county government can:

•    Keep taxes as low as possible;
•    Provide good and necessary jobs in county government;
•    Accelerate needed county capital improvement projects and road projects to inject additional work into the construction industry;
•    Provide workforce training and placement for those in need of work;
•    Provide rent and utility assistance to those who are struggling;
•    Provide foreclosure prevention counseling to those in fear of losing their homes;
•    Provide down payment assistance and lease-to-own opportunities for qualified home buyers; and
•    Target specific industries as a bulwark against economic uncertainty.

I hope that the first seven bullets above are not controversial. I expect and welcome controversy on the last bullet.

“Special support” is most often understood as some form of preferential tax treatment or abatement to lure a large employer to our region that would not otherwise locate here. I am not a fan of tax abatements generally for several reasons. First, the best ways for county government to attract and support businesses of any size are to keep taxes low, services high and infrastructure maintained. Second, most jobs are created by small businesses. And third, academic research over two decades indicates that, more often than not, tax abatements simply reward industry for going where the market was taking them anyway. However, I believe there is utility in offering abatements to industries providing a social benefit in a timid market, such as:

•    Encouraging businesses to locate or remain in targeted areas;
•    Innovation with a social benefit that has not yet gained sufficient market share to be cost competitive; and
•    Hiring and training of the otherwise under-skilled or under-employed.

An Economic Development Subcommittee of the commissioners court has been formed to examine all the tools for economic enrichment available to county governments. Tax incentives or abatements are among those tools along with other more traditional lures such as workforce training, robust infrastructure, public safety and the like. The members of the subcommittee are Commissioner Ron Davis, Commissioner Margaret Gomez and me.

I hope that the subcommittee will not favor an entitlement program of abatements distributed to all comers meeting a scoring matrix. My initial thoughts are to recommend a policy requiring an appropriate weighing of:

•    Desired future conditions for the community – what geographic areas of the county are most suitable for industry, what demographic populations are most in need of job training and employment, and what industries best fit these geographic circumstances and demographics?
•    Objective criteria – a scoring matrix including such elements as type of industry, numbers of jobs created, health insurance coverage provided, cost of utility, road and other infrastructure necessary to support the proposed business, demonstrated venture capital investment, etc.; and
•    Current economic circumstances – will the impact of the tax abatement shift undue burden onto other taxpayers or will the job creation benefits outweigh the shifted burden?

What you can do:

•    Attend and testify at our Economic Development Subcommittee meetings. I will post the meeting times and places on my website at www.SarahEckhardt.com.
•    Write or call the subcommittee members with your ideas:
         Commissioner Eckhardt – 854-9222, sarah.eckhardt@co.travis.tx.us
         Commissioner Gomez – 854-9444, margaret.gomez@co.travis.tx.us
         Commissioner Davis – 854-9111, ron.davis@co.travis.tx.us
•    Join the policy debate within other local governmental entities through attending public meetings, writing Letters to the Editor and talking to your neighbors and colleagues.